Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tulsa TechTulsa Tech
VS
York UniversityYork University
Tulsa Tech

Tulsa Tech

PO Box 477200, Tulsa, OK, US, 74147-7200

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://tulsatech.edu
703/1000Moderate

The oldest and largest technology center in Oklahoma’s Career Tech System, Tulsa Tech is a career & technology center school district dedicated to accelerating independence in our students through hands-on learning in state-of-the-art facilities. Tulsa Tech helps high...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:309
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
York University

York University

4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Toronto, on, CA, M3J 1P3

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://yorku.ca/
798/1000Fair

York University is a diverse community of students, faculty, and staff driving positive change. As one of the largest post-secondary communities in the world and with a uniquely global perspective, we are driven by passion and purpose as part of a forward-thinking co...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,129
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tulsa Tech

Tulsa Tech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
York University

York University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tulsa Tech in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for York University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tulsa Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tulsa Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - York University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

York University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tulsa Tech

Tulsa Tech

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TUL1769570445
York University

York University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
YOR1430301222

FAQ

Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tulsa Tech company and York University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tulsa Tech and York University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tulsa Tech and York University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tulsa Tech or York University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tulsa Tech or York University ?
Between Tulsa Tech and York University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tulsa Tech and York University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA