Comparison Overview
Tulsa Public Schools

Tulsa Public Schools
US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
About Tulsa Public Schools Tulsa Public Schools is a large and diverse urban district with a commitment to excellence by providing educational options to fit a number of learning styles. Our students lead through literacy, are empowered through experience, and contribut...

Austin Independent School District
4000 S I H 35, Austin, 78704, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Austin ISD is a diverse community of more than 10,000 employees, and we recognize that nothing is more essential to a great education system than innovative, talented, passionate educators. Whether you’re a recent graduate or an experienced professional seeking a new ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tulsa Public Schools







Austin Independent School District






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tulsa Public Schools in 2026.
Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Austin Independent School District in 2026.
Incident History - Tulsa Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tulsa Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Austin Independent School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Austin Independent School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tulsa Public Schools

Austin Independent School District
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.