Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

T-Systems do BrasilT-Systems do Brasil
VS
NTT DATA Business SolutionsNTT DATA Business Solutions
T-Systems do Brasil

T-Systems do Brasil

Rua Olimpíadas, 205 - 3º e 4º andares - Vila Olímpia, São Paulo, 04551-000, BR

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

Parte do Grupo Deutsche Telekom, a T-Systems possui cerca de 26 mil funcionários no mundo e receita de € 3,9 bilhões. Está presente em mais de 20 países e é uma das líderes globais no mercado de Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação (TIC). Atuando no Brasil desde 2001,...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:1,503
Subsidiaries:64
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NTT DATA Business Solutions

NTT DATA Business Solutions

Königsbreede 1, Bielefeld, 33605, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

We understand the business of our clients and know what it takes to transform it into the future. At NTT DATA Business Solutions, we drive innovation – from advisory and implementation to managed services and beyond. With SAP at our core and a powerful ecosystem of part...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:12,518
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
T-Systems do Brasil

T-Systems do Brasil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NTT DATA Business Solutions

NTT DATA Business Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T-Systems do Brasil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTT DATA Business Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - T-Systems do Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Systems do Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NTT DATA Business Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT DATA Business Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
T-Systems do Brasil

T-Systems do Brasil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NTT DATA Business Solutions

NTT DATA Business Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil company and NTT DATA Business Solutions company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil and NTT DATA Business Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil and NTT DATA Business Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - T-Systems do Brasil or NTT DATA Business Solutions ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - T-Systems do Brasil or NTT DATA Business Solutions ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil and NTT DATA Business Solutions, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between T-Systems do Brasil and NTT DATA Business Solutions, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1