Comparison Overview
T-Systems do Brasil

T-Systems do Brasil
Rua Olimpíadas, 205 - 3º e 4º andares - Vila Olímpia, São Paulo, 04551-000, BR
Last Update: 17/03/2026
Parte do Grupo Deutsche Telekom, a T-Systems possui cerca de 26 mil funcionários no mundo e receita de € 3,9 bilhões. Está presente em mais de 20 países e é uma das líderes globais no mercado de Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação (TIC). Atuando no Brasil desde 2001,...

Avanade
1191 2nd Ave, Seattle, 98101, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Avanade is the world’s leading expert on Microsoft. Trusted by over 7,000 clients worldwide, we deliver AI-driven solutions that unlock the full potential of people and technology, optimize operations, foster innovation and drive growth. As Microsoft’s Global SI Partne...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

T-Systems do Brasil







Avanade






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for T-Systems do Brasil in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Avanade in 2026.
Incident History - T-Systems do Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)
T-Systems do Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Avanade (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Avanade cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

T-Systems do Brasil

Avanade
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.
Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.