Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tshwane University of TechnologyTshwane University of Technology
VS
Ghent UniversityGhent University
Tshwane University of Technology

Tshwane University of Technology

Pretoria, Staatsartillerie Road, Pretoria West, Pretoria, Gauteng, ZA, 1

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tut.ac.za/
766/1000Fair

The Tshwane University of Technology (TUT) is a proud product of South Africa's first decade of democracy. While the size and scope of this dynamic new institution impress, the quality of its teaching, research and community engagement is what makes the University reall...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:6,403
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Ghent University

Ghent University

Universiteitsforum (Ufo) Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Gent, Gent, east flanders, BE, 9000

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ugent.be
796/1000Fair

Ghent University is a top 100 university and one of the major universities in Belgium, founded in 1817. Our 11 faculties offer a wide range of courses and conduct in-depth research within a wide range of scientific domains. We are a pluralistic university that is open t...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,252
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tshwane University of Technology

Tshwane University of Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ghent University

Ghent University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tshwane University of Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ghent University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tshwane University of Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tshwane University of Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ghent University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ghent University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tshwane University of Technology

Tshwane University of Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TSH212021124
Ghent University

Ghent University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology company and Ghent University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology and Ghent University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology and Ghent University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tshwane University of Technology or Ghent University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tshwane University of Technology or Ghent University ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology and Ghent University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tshwane University of Technology and Ghent University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1