Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway CompanyTSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company
VS
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company

TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company

2310 Industrial Dr SW, Cullman, Alabama, 35055, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tsebrakes.com
748/1000Moderate

TSE provides brake actuators and slack adjusters to industry leaders in both the OEM and Aftermarket segments in more than 30 countries around the world. TSE is known as a high-value manufacturer in a highly competitive market, our products provide an outstanding combi...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:59
Subsidiaries:74
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

615 J.B Hunt Corporate Drive, Lowell, 72745, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jbhunt.com
775/1000Fair

J.B. Hunt specializes in freight shipping for customers of all sizes. Our mission is to drive long-term value for our people, customers and shareholders while staying focused on our vision to create the most efficient transportation network in North America. Our foundat...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:22,134
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company

TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company

TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
JB-836072525

FAQ

Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company or J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company or J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TSE Brakes - A Marmon/Berkshire Hathaway Company and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44453
SUMMARY

h2o is an HTTP server with support for HTTP/1.x, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. Prior to commit 6b5370d, h2o is vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack when calling alloca under certain conditions. When serving static files, h2o builds the file path on stack, by calling alloca. The maximum size of the memory allocated using alloca can be as huge as ~600KB, which exceeds the default pthread stack size used by musl libc (128KB). If the amount of memory allocated by alloca exceeds the stack size, the h2o server crashes with a segmentation fault, while it tries to touch the guard page. This issue has been fixed by commit 6b5370d.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-16
UPDATED
Date2026-07-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-44452
SUMMARY

h2o is an HTTP server with support for HTTP/1.x, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. Prior to commit 8dc37cb, when h2o receives a ClientHello message over TLS or QUIC and it contains a zero-length SNI extension, the h2o server runs over the zero-length hostname while trying to copy the hostname, assuming that it is NULL-terminated. This is a potential denial-of-service attack vector in sense that it might trigger segmentation violation. This issue has been fixed by commit 8dc37cb.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-16
UPDATED
Date2026-07-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-44436
SUMMARY

Quicly is an IETF QUIC protocol implementation intended primarily for use within the H2O HTTP server. Prior to commit 8b178e6, Quicly is vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack through connection state corruption. In QUIC Invariants, the maximum length of a Connection ID is 255 bytes, while QUIC version 1 further restricts the maximum to 20 bytes. Quicly implements QUIC version 1 and therefore its CID buffers are limited to 20 bytes. However, to be able to respond to unknown versions of QUIC, its packet decoder accepts Connection IDs of up to 255 bytes. As its CID buffers are merely 20 bytes long, Quicly must reject QUIC version 1 packets with Connection IDs longer than that. The command line tool bundled with Quicly has had that check, however the library itself lacked such enforcement. As a consequence, when used by applications that lack their own enforcement, the connection state becoming inconsistent to buffer overrun. Fortunately, the overflow stops within the allocated chunk of memory, but nevertheless, the bug leads to assertion failures. This issue has been fixed by commit 8b178e6.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-16
UPDATED
Date2026-07-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-44435
SUMMARY

Quicly is an IETF QUIC protocol implementation intended primarily for use within the H2O HTTP server. Prior to commit 937d0e9, an assertion failure is raised when the total number of valid handshake messages received over a CRYPTO stream of a single packet number space exceeds 32KB, causing a Denial of Service. This issue has been fixed by commit 937d0e9.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-16
UPDATED
Date2026-07-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-44434
SUMMARY

Quicly is an IETF QUIC protocol implementation intended primarily for use within the H2O HTTP server. Prior to commit dccf5d4, Quicly was vulnerable to stateless reset injection through lack of packet entry validation. The QUIC protocol is designed to withstand packet injection attacks, once the handshake is complete. Only packets that carry some secret patterns are considered as stateless resets. Quicly allows the peer to share up to 4 such patterns per connection. However, until now, it failed to determine which of the 4 slots that it uses to retain the secret patterns contains a valid entry. As the slots are zero-initialized, the failure meant that, unless the peer advertised 4 of such patterns, an all-zero pattern was treated as a stateless reset.In effect, this allowed an on-path attacker to reset QUIC connections governed by Quicly. This issue has been fixed by commit dccf5d4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-16
UPDATED
Date2026-07-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9