Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tractor Supply Company FoundationTractor Supply Company Foundation
VS
Advance Auto PartsAdvance Auto Parts
Tractor Supply Company Foundation

Tractor Supply Company Foundation

5401 Virginia Way, Brentwood, 37027, US

Last Update: 09/01/2026

View Profile

Supporting vibrant rural communities for all, by investing in the future of the Out Here Lifestyle through today’s youth, helping close the rural digital divide and being a good neighbor in the communities we call home.

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Advance Auto Parts

Advance Auto Parts

2635 E. Millbrook Road, Raleigh, NC, US, 27604

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
719/1000Moderate

Advance Auto Parts, Inc. is a leading automotive aftermarket parts provider that serves both professional installers and do-it-yourself customers. As of October 5, 2024, Advance operated 4,781 stores primarily within the United States, with additional locations in Canad...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:24,307
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tractor Supply Company Foundation

Tractor Supply Company Foundation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Advance Auto Parts

Advance Auto Parts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tractor Supply Company Foundation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advance Auto Parts in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tractor Supply Company Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tractor Supply Company Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Advance Auto Parts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advance Auto Parts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tractor Supply Company Foundation

Tractor Supply Company Foundation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Advance Auto Parts

Advance Auto Parts

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ADV156082025
🔒 Incident : Breach
ADV439072625

FAQ

Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation and Advance Auto Parts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation and Advance Auto Parts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tractor Supply Company Foundation or Advance Auto Parts ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tractor Supply Company Foundation or Advance Auto Parts ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation and Advance Auto Parts, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tractor Supply Company Foundation and Advance Auto Parts, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3