Comparison Overview
TSB Bank

TSB Bank
8 Bishopsgate, London, EC2N 4BQ, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At TSB we’re pioneering a new kind of banking for Britain – one that’s simple, straightforward and cares about people. We offer friendly, honest and convenient banking that’s designed to meet our customers’ needs, not just ours. It’s what makes us different – that and ...

Citizens
1 Citizens Plaza, Providence, 02903, US
Last Update: 22/04/2026
At Citizens, we recognize that the journey to accomplishment is no longer linear and that individuals are made of all they have done and all they are going to do. As one of the oldest and largest financial services firms in the United States with a history dating back t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

TSB Bank







Citizens






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TSB Bank in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
Citizens has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - TSB Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TSB Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Citizens (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Citizens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

TSB Bank

Citizens
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.