Comparison Overview

TrueBlue Inc.

VS

ManpowerGroup

TrueBlue Inc.

1015 A Street, Tacoma, WA, 98402, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

TrueBlue (NYSE: TBI) is a leading staffing, recruiting and workforce management company. The company fills individual positions on demand, staffs entire facilities, and manages outsourced recruiting processes and staffing vendor programs for a wide variety of clients. The company's specialized workforce solutions meet clients'​ needs for a reliable, efficient workforce in a wide variety of industries including-- construction, energy, manufacturing, financial services, pharmaceuticals, transportation, aviation and energy. TrueBlue assigns as many as 100,000 people to work each day, drawing from a data base of hundreds of thousands of candidates, and places more than 250,000 people in permanent positions each year.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 11,451
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ManpowerGroup

100 Manpower Place, None, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US, 53212
Last Update: 2025-11-25

ManpowerGroup® (NYSE: MAN), the leading global workforce solutions company, helps organizations transform in a fast-changing world of work by sourcing, assessing, developing and managing the talent that enables them to win. We develop innovative solutions for hundreds of thousands of organizations every year, providing them with skilled talent while finding meaningful, sustainable employment for millions of people across a wide range of industries and skills. Our expert family of brands – Manpower, Experis and Talent Solutions – creates substantially more value for candidates and clients across more than 80 countries and territories and has done so for 75 years. We are recognized consistently for our diversity - as a best place to work for Women, Inclusion, Equality and Disability and in 2023 ManpowerGroup was named one of the World's Most Ethical Companies for the 14th year - all confirming our position as the brand of choice for in-demand talent. See how ManpowerGroup is powering the future of work: www.manpowergroup.com

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 72,018
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trueblue-inc-.jpeg
TrueBlue Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manpowergroup.jpeg
ManpowerGroup
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TrueBlue Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ManpowerGroup
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TrueBlue Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ManpowerGroup in 2025.

Incident History — TrueBlue Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TrueBlue Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ManpowerGroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ManpowerGroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trueblue-inc-.jpeg
TrueBlue Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manpowergroup.jpeg
ManpowerGroup
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Vishing (Voice Phishing)
Motivation: Extortion, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Network Intrusion (likely via unpatched vulnerability or phishing), Social Engineering (impersonating IT support via fake calls)
Motivation: Financial gain (ransomware) / Data theft, Data theft / Corporate espionage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

TrueBlue Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ManpowerGroup company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ManpowerGroup company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TrueBlue Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, ManpowerGroup company and TrueBlue Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

ManpowerGroup company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while TrueBlue Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ManpowerGroup company nor TrueBlue Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ManpowerGroup company nor TrueBlue Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TrueBlue Inc. company nor ManpowerGroup company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TrueBlue Inc. nor ManpowerGroup holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ManpowerGroup company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TrueBlue Inc. company.

ManpowerGroup company employs more people globally than TrueBlue Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Staffing and Recruiting.

Neither TrueBlue Inc. nor ManpowerGroup holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TrueBlue Inc. nor ManpowerGroup holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TrueBlue Inc. nor ManpowerGroup holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TrueBlue Inc. nor ManpowerGroup holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TrueBlue Inc. nor ManpowerGroup holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TrueBlue Inc. nor ManpowerGroup holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H