Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Alera Group (TRUEbenefits)Alera Group (TRUEbenefits)
VS
AllstateAllstate
Alera Group (TRUEbenefits)

Alera Group (TRUEbenefits)

601 Union Street, Seattle, 98101, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile

Beyond Benefits as Usual We ask questions you haven’t heard before. Digging deeper gives us the understanding to customize cost-effective solutions that advance our clients’ business goals, see them through times of rapid change, and help recruit and retain the best pe...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:12
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Allstate

Allstate

3100 Sanders Rd, Northbrook, 60062, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://al.st/WelcomeLI
670/1000Weak

At Allstate, we're advocates for peace of mind and a good life. And that comes through in everything we do. From building innovative teams that truly understand our customers' needs, to challenging each other to develop our careers in a meaningful way, and finally to ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:55,346
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alera Group (TRUEbenefits)

Alera Group (TRUEbenefits)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Allstate

Allstate

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Allstate has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Allstate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allstate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alera Group (TRUEbenefits)

Alera Group (TRUEbenefits)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRU951072825
Allstate

Allstate

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ALL1785522998
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALL3762437103025
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALL942072725

FAQ

Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) company and Allstate company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) and Allstate, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) and Allstate, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) or Allstate ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) or Allstate ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) and Allstate, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alera Group (TRUEbenefits) and Allstate, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA