Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022)Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022)
VS
AtlassianAtlassian
Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022)

Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022)

33 E 33rd St, New York, 10016, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://troops.ai
693/1000Weak

At Troops, we’re on a mission to make business software that works for humans. Go-to-market technology is intended to help individuals be more productive and help businesses grow, but often comes with unintentional silos and seemingly endless administrative work. Troops...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:18
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Atlassian

Atlassian

Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 06/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://atlassian.com/
754/1000Fair

Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practice...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:16,931
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022)

Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atlassian

Atlassian

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Atlassian has 494.06% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022)

Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRO1793417112225
Atlassian

Atlassian

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ATL1791296955
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ATL1786359965
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ATL1C-1789741437

FAQ

Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) company and Atlassian company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) and Atlassian, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) and Atlassian, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) or Atlassian ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) or Atlassian ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) and Atlassian, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Troops (Acquired by Salesforce - July 2022) and Atlassian, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9