Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Trivadis - Part of AccentureTrivadis - Part of Accenture
VS
ReplyReply
Trivadis - Part of Accenture

Trivadis - Part of Accenture

Sägereistrasse 29, Glattbrugg, Zürich, CH, 8152

Last Update: 08/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.accenture.com
751/1000Fair

Trivadis is an IT service provider with 15 workspaces in Switzerland, Germany, Austria and Romania. Since August 5th 2021 Trivadis has been part of Accenture. We accompany and support our clients through the digital transformation process. Working with them, we refine...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:93
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Reply

Reply

C.so Francia, 110, Turin, 10143, IT

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.reply.com
764/1000Fair

Reply [EXM, STAR: REY] specialises in the design and implementation of solutions based on new communication channels and digital media. As a network of highly specialised companies, Reply defines and develops business models enabled by the new models of AI, big data, cl...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:16,816
Subsidiaries:117
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Trivadis - Part of Accenture

Trivadis - Part of Accenture

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Reply

Reply

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trivadis - Part of Accenture in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reply in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Trivadis - Part of Accenture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trivadis - Part of Accenture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Trivadis - Part of Accenture

Trivadis - Part of Accenture

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Reply

Reply

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture company and Reply company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture and Reply, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture and Reply, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Trivadis - Part of Accenture or Reply ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Trivadis - Part of Accenture or Reply ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture and Reply, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Trivadis - Part of Accenture and Reply, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2