Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Triton HearingTriton Hearing
VS
Anytime FitnessAnytime Fitness
Triton Hearing

Triton Hearing

Unit 7/6-8 Omega Street, Rosedale, Auckland, AUK, NZ, 0632

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

At Triton Hearing we are leading the way in providing world-first hearing care service and solutions to New Zealanders. We offer clinical excellence and client-centred service through our network nationwide. Our people and our clients are our passion. We focus our bu...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:153
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Anytime Fitness

Anytime Fitness

111 Weir Drive, Woodbury, 55125, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://AnytimeFitness.com
778/1000Fair

Anytime Fitness is the healthiest franchise opportunity on the planet. As the fastest-growing fitness franchise in the world, Anytime Fitness helps more than three million members in more than three thousand gyms around the globe get to a healthier place. Recently honor...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:18,108
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Triton Hearing

Triton Hearing

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Anytime Fitness

Anytime Fitness

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health, Wellness & Fitness Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Triton Hearing in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Health, Wellness & Fitness Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anytime Fitness in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Triton Hearing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Triton Hearing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Anytime Fitness (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anytime Fitness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Triton Hearing

Triton Hearing

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Anytime Fitness

Anytime Fitness

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Triton Hearing company and Anytime Fitness company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Triton Hearing and Anytime Fitness, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Triton Hearing and Anytime Fitness, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Triton Hearing or Anytime Fitness ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Triton Hearing or Anytime Fitness ?
Between Triton Hearing and Anytime Fitness, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Triton Hearing and Anytime Fitness, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56078
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56077
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56076
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56075
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56074
SUMMARY

PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-18
UPDATED
Date2026-06-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8