Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TRISTAR Insurance GroupTRISTAR Insurance Group
VS
Sunshine Insurance GroupSunshine Insurance Group
TRISTAR Insurance Group

TRISTAR Insurance Group

100 Oceangate, Suite 700, Long Beach, 90802, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tristargroup.net
727/1000Moderate

TRISTAR began as an insurance program manager and medical malpractice claims administrator in 1987. Workers compensation claims management services were added in our offerings in 1989, and the Company was renamed TRISTAR Risk Management in 1995. As managed care and be...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:530
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Sunshine Insurance Group

Sunshine Insurance Group

朝外大街, 朝阳区, 100020, CN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sinosig.com/
766/1000Fair

Established in July 2005, Sunshine Insurance Group has experienced sustainable development, now ranking among the Top 7 insurance groups in China, with an annual business income of $12.6 billion in 2016. Sunshine is composed of Property and Casualty Insurance, Life Insu...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:10,340
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TRISTAR Insurance Group

TRISTAR Insurance Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sunshine Insurance Group

Sunshine Insurance Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TRISTAR Insurance Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sunshine Insurance Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TRISTAR Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TRISTAR Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sunshine Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sunshine Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TRISTAR Insurance Group

TRISTAR Insurance Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRI816072625
Sunshine Insurance Group

Sunshine Insurance Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group company and Sunshine Insurance Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TRISTAR Insurance Group or Sunshine Insurance Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TRISTAR Insurance Group or Sunshine Insurance Group ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TRISTAR Insurance Group and Sunshine Insurance Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2