Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company)Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company)
VS
Securitas GroupSecuritas Group
Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company)

Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company)

13530 Dulles Technology Dr, Herndon, 20171, US

Last Update: 01/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.constellis.com
770/1000Fair

Triple Canopy is a Constellis company. Please follow Constellis'​ LinkedIn page for news and information regarding any of its brands. Constellis is a leading provider of risk management and operational support services to government and commercial clients worldwide....

NAICS:5616
NAICS Definition:Investigation and Security Services
Employees:2,899
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Securitas Group

Securitas Group

Lindhagensplan 70, Stockholm, 102 28 , SE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.securitas.com
749/1000Moderate

This is the official LinkedIn page of the Securitas Group. Securitas is a world-leading safety and security solutions partner that helps make your world a safer place. Almost nine decades of deep experience means we see what others miss. By leveraging technology in pa...

NAICS:5616
NAICS Definition:Investigation and Security Services
Employees:10,934
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company)

Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Securitas Group

Securitas Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Securitas Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Securitas Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Securitas Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company)

Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Securitas Group

Securitas Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SEC145311522

FAQ

Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) company and Securitas Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) and Securitas Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) and Securitas Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) or Securitas Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) or Securitas Group ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) and Securitas Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Triple Canopy (A Constellis Company) and Securitas Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA