Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TridiumTridium
VS
MicrosoftMicrosoft
Tridium

Tridium

3951 Westerre Parkway, Richmond, 23233, US

Last Update: 13/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tridium.com
749/1000Moderate

Tridium, a global software and technology company, is the developer of the Niagara Framework®, a software platform that enables the integration of disparate systems and devices - regardless of manufacturer or communication protocol - into a unified platform that can be...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:187
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Microsoft

Microsoft

1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, 98052, US

Last Update: 06/10/2026

View Profile
548/1000Critical

Every company has a mission. What's ours? To empower every person and every organization to achieve more. We believe technology can and should be a force for good and that meaningful innovation contributes to a brighter world in the future and today. Our culture doesn’t...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:233,556
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
28
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tridium

Tridium

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Microsoft

Microsoft

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Tridium has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Microsoft has 2645.1% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Tridium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tridium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Microsoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tridium

Tridium

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIEVERTRACARTRIDEL1786611575
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TRIVER1786618728
Microsoft

Microsoft

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIC1791303903
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIC1790396628
🔒 Incident : Breach
PT-MICWAT1790691984

FAQ

Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tridium company and Microsoft company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tridium and Microsoft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tridium and Microsoft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tridium or Microsoft ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tridium or Microsoft ?
Between Tridium and Microsoft, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tridium and Microsoft, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA