Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TrekpleisterTrekpleister
VS
Old NavyOld Navy
Trekpleister

Trekpleister

Nijborg 17, Renswoude, undefined, 3927 DA, NL

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile

Trekpleister is onderdeel van de AS Watson Group. De AS Watson Group is werelds grootste internationale health & beauty retailer. Met meer dan 16.800 winkels onder 12 retailmerken in 30 markten, met ruim 130.000 medewerkers wereldwijd. Voor het fiscale jaar 2023 boekte ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:542
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Old Navy

Old Navy

2 Folsom Street, San Francisco, 94158, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
802/1000Good

Forget what you know about old-school industry rules. When you work at Old Navy, you’re choosing a different path. From day one, we’ve been on a mission to democratize fashion and make shopping fun again. Our teams make style accessible to everyone, creating high-qualit...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:29,072
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Trekpleister

Trekpleister

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Old Navy

Old Navy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trekpleister in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old Navy in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Trekpleister (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trekpleister cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Old Navy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old Navy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Trekpleister

Trekpleister

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Old Navy

Old Navy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Trekpleister company and Old Navy company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Trekpleister and Old Navy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Trekpleister and Old Navy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Trekpleister or Old Navy ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Trekpleister or Old Navy ?
Between Trekpleister and Old Navy, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Trekpleister and Old Navy, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA