Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Traveltime Mobility India Pvt LtdTraveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd
VS
LyftLyft
Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd

Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd

N/A

Last Update: 06/10/2026

View Profile
652/1000Weak

Traveltime is one of India's leading mobility and transportation service providers, delivering safe, reliable, and technology-enabled passenger transportation solutions across corporate, public, and intercity networks. With over 30 years of industry experience, the comp...

NAICS:485
NAICS Definition:Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation
Employees:41
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Lyft

Lyft

185 Berry Street, San Francisco, CA, US, 94107

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.lyft.com/
737/1000Moderate

Whether it’s an everyday commute or a journey that changes everything, Lyft is driven by our purpose: to serve and connect. In 2012, Lyft was founded as one of the first ridesharing communities in the United States. Now, millions of drivers have chosen to earn on billio...

NAICS:485
NAICS Definition:Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation
Employees:27,444
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd

Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lyft

Lyft

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Ground Passenger Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd has 75.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Ground Passenger Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Lyft has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lyft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd

Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRA1791260682
Lyft

Lyft

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ELFTEMCOUGRUAMASAMLYF1777580773

FAQ

Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd company and Lyft company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd and Lyft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd and Lyft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd or Lyft ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd or Lyft ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd and Lyft, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Traveltime Mobility India Pvt Ltd and Lyft, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8