Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Travel + Leisure Co.Travel + Leisure Co.
VS
Shangri-La GroupShangri-La Group
Travel + Leisure Co.

Travel + Leisure Co.

6277 Sea Harbor Dr, Orlando, Florida, US, 32821

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
797/1000Fair

Travel + Leisure Co., the world's leading vacation ownership and membership travel company, provides more than six million vacations to travelers every year. The company’s extensive Vacation Ownership portfolio includes trusted and iconic vacation club brands with a com...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:14,631
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Shangri-La Group

Shangri-La Group

Kerry Centre, 683 King's Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong, HK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
726/1000Moderate

Headquartered in Hong Kong SAR, the Shangri-La Group has grown from a single hotel business to a diverse and integrated global portfolio comprising quality real estate and investment properties, wellness and lifestyle facilities. Today, the Group owns, operates and mana...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:16,362
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Travel + Leisure Co.

Travel + Leisure Co.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Shangri-La Group

Shangri-La Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travel + Leisure Co. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shangri-La Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Travel + Leisure Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travel + Leisure Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Shangri-La Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shangri-La Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Travel + Leisure Co.

Travel + Leisure Co.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Shangri-La Group

Shangri-La Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SHA2110161122

FAQ

Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. company and Shangri-La Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. and Shangri-La Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. and Shangri-La Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Travel + Leisure Co. or Shangri-La Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Travel + Leisure Co. or Shangri-La Group ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. and Shangri-La Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Travel + Leisure Co. and Shangri-La Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2