Comparison Overview

TravelAge West

VS

Condé Nast Britain

TravelAge West

11400 W. Olympic Blvd., STE 325, Los Angeles, California, 90064, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For more than 50 years, TravelAge West has been the trusted voice of the travel industry in the West. With our award-winning writing and design, our publication and our website, TravelAgeWest.com, TravelAge West brings the best of travel to life for our readers. The magazine's first-hand, on-site reports and fresh destination coverage is a valued resource for travel agents.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Condé Nast Britain

1-2 Hanover Square , None, London , London, GB, W1S 1JX
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Condé Nast is a global media company producing the highest quality magazines and digital content. For more than 100 years, Condé Nast has been renowned as the authority on the latest trends in beauty, fashion, interiors and luxury products, and for influential reporting - from cutting-edge exposés in current affairs to truthful views on travel experiences. Condé Nast Britain continues to lead the luxury multimedia publishing industry and produces 10 magazines: Vogue, House & Garden, Tatler, The World of Interiors, GQ, Vanity Fair, Wired, Condé Nast Traveller, Glamour and GQ Style. In addition to creating the finest brands, Condé Nast Britain also leads the way in producing outstanding content across multiple platforms: Ars Technica, Condé Nast Digital, Condé Nast Contract Publishing and the Condé Nast Johansens hotel guides. The Condé Nast College of Fashion & Design opened in central London in 2013 and offers a BA (Hons) Fashion Communication Degree, a year-long Vogue Fashion Foundation Diploma and various other shorter courses. For more information, please visit: https://www.condenast.co.uk/

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 142
Subsidiaries: 71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travelage-west.jpeg
TravelAge West
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/condénastbritain.jpeg
Condé Nast Britain
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TravelAge West
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Condé Nast Britain
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TravelAge West in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Condé Nast Britain in 2025.

Incident History — TravelAge West (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TravelAge West cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Condé Nast Britain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Condé Nast Britain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travelage-west.jpeg
TravelAge West
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/condénastbritain.jpeg
Condé Nast Britain
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Condé Nast Britain company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TravelAge West company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Condé Nast Britain company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TravelAge West company has not reported any.

In the current year, Condé Nast Britain company and TravelAge West company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Condé Nast Britain company nor TravelAge West company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Condé Nast Britain company has disclosed at least one data breach, while TravelAge West company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Condé Nast Britain company nor TravelAge West company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TravelAge West company nor Condé Nast Britain company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TravelAge West nor Condé Nast Britain holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Condé Nast Britain company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TravelAge West company.

Condé Nast Britain company employs more people globally than TravelAge West company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither TravelAge West nor Condé Nast Britain holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TravelAge West nor Condé Nast Britain holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TravelAge West nor Condé Nast Britain holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TravelAge West nor Condé Nast Britain holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TravelAge West nor Condé Nast Britain holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TravelAge West nor Condé Nast Britain holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.