Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Travel GuardTravel Guard
VS
IntactIntact
Travel Guard

Travel Guard

2929 Allen Parkway AT14, Houston, TX, 77019, US

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.travelguard.com
753/1000Fair

Travel Guard meets the diverse needs of leisure and corporate travelers alike through its comprehensive portfolio of travel insurance plans and assistance services as well as a network of experienced providers. With global service centers placed strategically around the...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:316
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Intact

Intact

700 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 0A1, CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

We created a purpose-driven company based on Values and a belief that insurance is about people, not things. This is the foundation on which we have built Intact and it lives every day through our purpose, Values, what we aim to achieve and how. ___ Nous sommes là pour...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:20,853
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Travel Guard

Travel Guard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Intact

Intact

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travel Guard in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intact in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Travel Guard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travel Guard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Intact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Travel Guard

Travel Guard

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Intact

Intact

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Travel Guard company and Intact company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Travel Guard and Intact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Travel Guard and Intact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Travel Guard or Intact ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Travel Guard or Intact ?
Between Travel Guard and Intact, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Travel Guard and Intact, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-73250
SUMMARY

Notepad++ is a free and open-source source code editor. Prior to 8.9.7, the Notepad++ Windows 11 x64 and ARM64 installer passes the attacker-influenced installation directory `$INSTDIR` from PowerEditor/installer/nppSetup.nsi into a PowerShell `-Command` string used by RegisterMSIX to invoke Add-AppxPackage, allowing PowerShell subexpression syntax such as `$()` in the installation path to execute commands in the installer's security context when the context menu component is selected. This issue is fixed in version 8.9.7.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-73249
SUMMARY

calibre is an e-book manager. Prior to 9.12.0, the calibre Content Server endpoint POST /book-update-annotations/{library_id}/{book_id}/{fmt} in src/calibre/srv/books.py omits needs_db_write=True, causing Router.dispatch() to skip ctx.check_for_write_access() before update_annotations() passes attacker-controlled JSON to db.merge_annotations_for_book(), which allows a readonly user or an anonymous user on an unauthenticated deployment to persist unauthorized book annotation changes. This issue is fixed in version 9.12.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-73248
SUMMARY

calibre is an e-book manager. Prior to 9.12.0, calibre processes attacker-controlled composite_template metadata from a malicious EPUB, OPF, PDF, or similar file through program: and a nested template() call whose formatter does not inherit allow_python_templates=False, allowing a nested python: template to reach compile_python_template and execute arbitrary Python code when the file is opened or imported. This issue is fixed in version 9.12.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-73247
SUMMARY

Kestra is an open-source, event-driven orchestration platform. Prior to 2.0.0, Kestra's core/src/main/java/io/kestra/core/runners/pebble/functions/HttpFunction.java passes the user-controlled http() uri argument to URI.create() and the server-side HTTP client without restricting private, loopback, or link-local destinations, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to import and execute a flow that accesses internal services or cloud metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-73246
SUMMARY

Kestra is an open-source, event-driven orchestration platform. Prior to 2.0.0-rc6, Kestra's worker/src/main/java/io/kestra/worker/endpoint/WorkerEndpoint.java serves GET /worker without authentication and serializes the complete live Task object, which can expose commands, environment variables, HTTP headers, connection details, plaintext credentials, and execution identifiers while the main API on port 8080 remains protected. This issue is fixed in 2.0.0-rc6.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9