Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. AntoniusCentrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius
VS
NMC HealthcareNMC Healthcare
Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Utrecht, NL

Last Update: 08/04/2026

View Profile

Het Centrum voor Traumageriatrie is onderdeel van het St. Antonius Ziekenhuis. Het St. Antonius staat landelijk bekend om zijn expertise op het gebied van hart-, vaat-, longziekten en kanker. Daarnaast zijn vrijwel alle specialismen vertegenwoordigd. Samen zorgen voor k...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NMC Healthcare

NMC Healthcare

Al Ain Towers, Al Khalidiyah St - Al Bateen - W10, Abu Dhabi, AE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://nmc.ae/
791/1000Fair

NMC Healthcare is one of the largest private healthcare networks in the United Arab Emirates. Since 1975, we have provided high quality, personalised, and compassionate care to our patients and are proud to have earned the trust of millions of people in the UAE and arou...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:10,628
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NMC Healthcare

NMC Healthcare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NMC Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NMC Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NMC Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NMC Healthcare

NMC Healthcare

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and NMC Healthcare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and NMC Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and NMC Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius or NMC Healthcare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius or NMC Healthcare ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and NMC Healthcare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and NMC Healthcare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8