Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. AntoniusCentrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius
VS
Fresenius Medical CareFresenius Medical Care
Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Utrecht, NL

Last Update: 08/04/2026

View Profile

Het Centrum voor Traumageriatrie is onderdeel van het St. Antonius Ziekenhuis. Het St. Antonius staat landelijk bekend om zijn expertise op het gebied van hart-, vaat-, longziekten en kanker. Daarnaast zijn vrijwel alle specialismen vertegenwoordigd. Samen zorgen voor k...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fresenius Medical Care

Fresenius Medical Care

Else-Kröner-Strasse 1, Bad Homburg, 61352, DE

Last Update: 06/04/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Fresenius Medical Care is the world’s leading provider of products and services for individuals with renal diseases. We aim to create a future worth living for chronically and critically ill patients – worldwide and every day. Thanks to our decades of experience in dia...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:50,732
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fresenius Medical Care

Fresenius Medical Care

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresenius Medical Care in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fresenius Medical Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresenius Medical Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fresenius Medical Care

Fresenius Medical Care

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CARFRE1775507258

FAQ

Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Fresenius Medical Care company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and Fresenius Medical Care, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and Fresenius Medical Care, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius or Fresenius Medical Care ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius or Fresenius Medical Care ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and Fresenius Medical Care, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and Fresenius Medical Care, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2