Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. AntoniusCentrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius
VS
Boston Medical Center (BMC)Boston Medical Center (BMC)
Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Utrecht, NL

Last Update: 08/04/2026

View Profile

Het Centrum voor Traumageriatrie is onderdeel van het St. Antonius Ziekenhuis. Het St. Antonius staat landelijk bekend om zijn expertise op het gebied van hart-, vaat-, longziekten en kanker. Daarnaast zijn vrijwel alle specialismen vertegenwoordigd. Samen zorgen voor k...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Boston Medical Center (BMC)

Boston Medical Center (BMC)

One Boston Medical Center Place, Boston, MA, US, 02118-2999

Last Update: 10/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bmc.org
782/1000Fair

Boston Medical Center (BMC) is a 511-bed, equity-led academic medical center and a proud member of the Boston Medical Center Health System. BMC delivers a model of healthcare where innovative and equitable care empowers all patients to thrive. As a premier academic medi...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:10,014
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Boston Medical Center (BMC)

Boston Medical Center (BMC)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Medical Center (BMC) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Boston Medical Center (BMC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Medical Center (BMC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Boston Medical Center (BMC)

Boston Medical Center (BMC)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius company and Boston Medical Center (BMC) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and Boston Medical Center (BMC), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and Boston Medical Center (BMC), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius or Boston Medical Center (BMC) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius or Boston Medical Center (BMC) ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and Boston Medical Center (BMC), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Centrum voor Traumageriatrie St. Antonius and Boston Medical Center (BMC), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1