Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbHTraum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH
VS
YouTubeYouTube
Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH

Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH

An der Reeperbahn 6, Bremen, 28217, DE

Last Update: 19/01/2026

View Profile
765/1000Fair

For over 20 years, Traum-Ferienwohnungen has been bringing hosts and holiday guests together—and creating personal connections. As one of the largest holiday accommodation marketplaces, we help travelers find the right place where they can feel at home. With over 115 e...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:36
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
YouTube

YouTube

901 Cherry Ave., San Bruno, 94066, US

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.youtube.com/jobs
748/1000Moderate

YouTube is a team-oriented, creative workplace where every single employee has a voice in the choices we make and the features we implement. We work together in small teams to design, develop, and roll out key features and products in very short time frames. Which means...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:144,383
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH

Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
YouTube

YouTube

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

YouTube has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - YouTube (X = Date, Y = Severity)

YouTube cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH

Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
YouTube

YouTube

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MEDZYPTELMETTIKGOOYOU1770029110
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
YOUGOO1782210666
🔒 Incident : Breach
GOOYOU1766548552

FAQ

Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH company and YouTube company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH and YouTube, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH and YouTube, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH or YouTube ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH or YouTube ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH and YouTube, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Traum-Ferienwohnungen GmbH and YouTube, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2