Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Transpacific Financial Inc.Transpacific Financial Inc.
VS
中国人民保险 PICC中国人民保险 PICC
Transpacific Financial Inc.

Transpacific Financial Inc.

1045 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia, 91007, US

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
691/1000Weak

Transpacific Financial Inc. is an insurance agency located in Southern California. Since 1994, we have been offering our insurance wholesale and financial planning services to the public with close to 1,000 contracted full time/part time professional agents working unde...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:93
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
中国人民保险 PICC

中国人民保险 PICC

清华西路28号, 海淀区, 100084, CN

Last Update: 06/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.picc.com
764/1000Fair

Founded in October 1949, The People’s Insurance Company (Group) of China is the first nation-wide insurance company in the People’s Republic of China and has developed into a leading large-scale integrated insurance financial group in the PRC, ranking 208th on the Globa...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:7,623
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Transpacific Financial Inc.

Transpacific Financial Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
中国人民保险 PICC

中国人民保险 PICC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Transpacific Financial Inc. has 31.03% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 中国人民保险 PICC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Transpacific Financial Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transpacific Financial Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - 中国人民保险 PICC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

中国人民保险 PICC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Transpacific Financial Inc.

Transpacific Financial Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRA1777574579
中国人民保险 PICC

中国人民保险 PICC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. company and 中国人民保险 PICC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. and 中国人民保险 PICC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. and 中国人民保险 PICC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Transpacific Financial Inc. or 中国人民保险 PICC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Transpacific Financial Inc. or 中国人民保险 PICC ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. and 中国人民保险 PICC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Transpacific Financial Inc. and 中国人民保险 PICC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA