Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

European Parliament Translation ServiceEuropean Parliament Translation Service
VS
Propio Language ServicesPropio Language Services
European Parliament Translation Service

European Parliament Translation Service

Pleateau du Kirchberg, Luxembourg, 2929, LU

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile

The translation service (Directorate-General for Translation and Clear Language - DG TRAD) of the European Parliament produces translations of written documents in all 24 official EU languages, enabling communication with its citizens in their mother tongue. Our vision...

NAICS:54193
NAICS Definition:Translation and Interpretation Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Propio Language Services

Propio Language Services

4950 College Blvd, Overland Park, Kansas, US, 66211

Last Update: 25/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.propio.com/
719/1000Moderate

Language Access, Driven by Innovation. We believe our technology-forward commitment allows us to offer a full suite of over-the-phone, video remote, in-person interpreting, translation and localization services. Our services provide Limited English Proficient speakers...

NAICS:54193
NAICS Definition:Translation and Interpretation Services
Employees:11,597
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
European Parliament Translation Service

European Parliament Translation Service

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Propio Language Services

Propio Language Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Translation and Localization Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for European Parliament Translation Service in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Translation and Localization Industry Avg (This Year)

Propio Language Services has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - European Parliament Translation Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

European Parliament Translation Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Propio Language Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Propio Language Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
European Parliament Translation Service

European Parliament Translation Service

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Propio Language Services

Propio Language Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO1787632254

FAQ

Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service company and Propio Language Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service and Propio Language Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service and Propio Language Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - European Parliament Translation Service or Propio Language Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - European Parliament Translation Service or Propio Language Services ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service and Propio Language Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between European Parliament Translation Service and Propio Language Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9