Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Transitions OpticalTransitions Optical
VS
Dentsply SironaDentsply Sirona
Transitions Optical

Transitions Optical

Global, Company, undefined, undefined, OO

Last Update: 27/11/2025

View Profile
760/1000Fair

At Transitions Optical we help people live more vibrant lives by enhancing their vision and the way they perceive light. We were the first to successfully commercialise a plastic photochromic lens in 1990 and our talented people continue to make significant advances...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:866
Subsidiaries:71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Dentsply Sirona

Dentsply Sirona

13320 Ballantyne Corporate Pl, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28277

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

A Global Total Solutions Provider Dentsply Sirona is the world’s largest manufacturer of professional dental products and technologies, empowering dental professionals to provide better, safer and faster dental care. Our products and solutions include leading position...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,199
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Transitions Optical

Transitions Optical

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dentsply Sirona

Dentsply Sirona

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Device Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transitions Optical in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Device Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dentsply Sirona in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Transitions Optical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transitions Optical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dentsply Sirona (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dentsply Sirona cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Transitions Optical

Transitions Optical

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Dentsply Sirona

Dentsply Sirona

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Transitions Optical company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Transitions Optical and Dentsply Sirona, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Transitions Optical and Dentsply Sirona, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Transitions Optical or Dentsply Sirona ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Transitions Optical or Dentsply Sirona ?
Between Transitions Optical and Dentsply Sirona, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Transitions Optical and Dentsply Sirona, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA