Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Trane Chicago/Central IllinoisTrane Chicago/Central Illinois
VS
thyssenkruppthyssenkrupp
Trane Chicago/Central Illinois

Trane Chicago/Central Illinois

7100 S. Madison Street, Willowbrook, 60527, US

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.trane.com/chicago
745/1000Moderate

Trane is a leading provider of commercial HVAC Equipment, Building Controls, Service, Energy Services, and Parts.

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp Allee 1, Essen, 45143, DE

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

thyssenkrupp is an international industrial and technology group with more than 93,000 employees. In the fiscal year 2024/2025, the company generated sales of around €33 billion in 48 countries. Its business activities are bundled in five segments: Automotive Technology...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:36,306
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Trane Chicago/Central Illinois

Trane Chicago/Central Illinois

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trane Chicago/Central Illinois in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for thyssenkrupp in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Trane Chicago/Central Illinois (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trane Chicago/Central Illinois cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - thyssenkrupp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

thyssenkrupp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Trane Chicago/Central Illinois

Trane Chicago/Central Illinois

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THY355092125

FAQ

Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois company and thyssenkrupp company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois and thyssenkrupp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois and thyssenkrupp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Trane Chicago/Central Illinois or thyssenkrupp ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Trane Chicago/Central Illinois or thyssenkrupp ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois and thyssenkrupp, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Trane Chicago/Central Illinois and thyssenkrupp, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3