Comparison Overview
Tragsatec

Tragsatec
N/A
Last Update: 27/04/2026
Tragsatec, founded in 1989, is one of the enterprises that form Tragsa Group, a holding of public companies member of the State Industrial Ownership Corporation (SEPI). It performs works of engineering and technical assistance in several fields that include: environm...

Environment Agency
Horizon House, Bristol, BS1 5AH, GB
Last Update: 13/09/2026
We are the Environment Agency. We are the biggest and most wide-ranging environmental regulator in Europe. We work with businesses and communities to protect and improve the environment, for people and wildlife. And the need for our work is becoming ever more important....
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tragsatec







Environment Agency






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tragsatec in 2026.
Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Environment Agency in 2026.
Incident History - Tragsatec (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tragsatec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Environment Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Environment Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tragsatec

Environment Agency
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.