Comparison Overview
TraceGains

TraceGains
12303 Airport Way, Broomfield, CO, 80021, US
Last Update: 04/03/2026
Founded in 2008, TraceGains connects people and information so teams can work smarter. As a global technology company, we provide networked innovation, quality, and compliance solutions to consumer brands that want to reduce supply chain risk, speed up business processe...

Atlassian
Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, NSW, AU, 2000
Last Update: 22/04/2026
Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practice...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

TraceGains







Atlassian






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TraceGains in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Atlassian has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - TraceGains (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TraceGains cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

TraceGains

Atlassian
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.