Comparison Overview
TP-Link Technologies de México

TP-Link Technologies de México
Blvd. Cervantes Saavedra 233, Granada, Miguel Hidalgo, CDMX, 11520, MX
Last Update: 27/10/2025
Somos la empresa líder en el mercado global de productos de redes y comunicaciones orientados a proveer soluciones al usuario final en el sector SOHO y SMB. Desde que nos establecimos en México en 2011, la empresa se ha convertido en uno de los competidores dentro del...

Iron Mountain
33 Arch St, Boston, 02110, US
Last Update: 07/05/2026
In the era of AI, your data is your advantage. Yet too often it remains untapped: disconnected from systems, underutilized, untrained, and exposed to risk. Iron Mountain is the trusted partner for organizations of all sizes to unlock what’s possible, transforming inform...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

TP-Link Technologies de México







Iron Mountain






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TP-Link Technologies de México in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Iron Mountain in 2026.
Incident History - TP-Link Technologies de México (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TP-Link Technologies de México cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Iron Mountain (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Iron Mountain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

TP-Link Technologies de México

Iron Mountain
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.