Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TP-Link MEATP-Link MEA
VS
T-Systems InternationalT-Systems International
TP-Link MEA

TP-Link MEA

Office 501, The Business Center, Dubai, P.O. Box 125857, AE

Last Update: 31/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tp-link.ae
751/1000Fair

Founded in 1996, TP-Link is a global provider of reliable networking devices and accessories, involved in all aspects of everyday life. The company is consistently ranked by analyst firm IDC as the No. 1 provider of WLAN and broadband CPE devices*, supplying distributio...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:116
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
T-Systems International

T-Systems International

Hahnstraße 43d, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, DE

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.t-systems.com
775/1000Fair

Your digitalization partner with industry expertise With locations in more than 26 countries and over 26,000 employees (2024), T-Systems is one of the leading providers of digital services in Europe. The Deutsche Telekom subsidiary is headquartered in Germany and has a...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,749
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TP-Link MEA

TP-Link MEA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
T-Systems International

T-Systems International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TP-Link MEA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T-Systems International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TP-Link MEA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TP-Link MEA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - T-Systems International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Systems International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TP-Link MEA

TP-Link MEA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
T-Systems International

T-Systems International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TP-Link MEA company and T-Systems International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TP-Link MEA and T-Systems International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TP-Link MEA and T-Systems International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TP-Link MEA or T-Systems International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TP-Link MEA or T-Systems International ?
Between TP-Link MEA and T-Systems International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TP-Link MEA and T-Systems International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9