Comparison Overview
TPG Telecom Business

TPG Telecom Business
Barangaroo Av, None, Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2000
Last Update: 31/10/2025
With our reliable, secure, and robust mobile services, you can discover the level of success your team is truly capable of. Let’s do business together.

Claro Brasil
Rua Henri Dunant, 780, São Paulo, 04709-110, BR
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Prazer, somos a Claro! Aqui, temos um grande time que faz tudo acontecer! É com o esforço e a dedicação de cada uma de nossas Pessoas que somos hoje referência no que fazemos, atuando unidos no nosso propósito, que é “Conectar para uma vida mais divertida e produtiva”....
Compliance Ranges Comparison

TPG Telecom Business







Claro Brasil






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TPG Telecom Business in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Claro Brasil in 2026.
Incident History - TPG Telecom Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TPG Telecom Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Claro Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Claro Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

TPG Telecom Business

Claro Brasil
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.