Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TP-Link Systems Inc.TP-Link Systems Inc.
VS
Voltas Limited - A TATA EnterpriseVoltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise
TP-Link Systems Inc.

TP-Link Systems Inc.

10 Mauchly, Irvine, 92618, US

Last Update: 03/08/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.tp-link.com/us/
646/1000Poor

Headquartered in the United States, TP-Link Systems Inc. is a global provider of reliable networking devices and smart home products, consistently ranked as the world's top provider of Wi-Fi devices. The company is committed to delivering innovative products that enhanc...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:382
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas House , A Block, Chinchpokli, Mumbai, Mumbai, 400033, IN

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.voltas.com/
796/1000Fair

Voltas is the No. 1* Room Air Conditioner Brand in India. Apart from ACs, Voltas offers a wide range of cooling products including Air Coolers, Commercial Refrigeration, Water Coolers and Water Dispensers. Apart from being the leaders in consumer products, Voltas is als...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:14,055
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TP-Link Systems Inc.

TP-Link Systems Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

TP-Link Systems Inc. has 319.16% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TP-Link Systems Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TP-Link Systems Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TP-Link Systems Inc.

TP-Link Systems Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TP-1785774351
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TP-1784276626
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TP-1776673453
Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TP-Link Systems Inc. or Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TP-Link Systems Inc. or Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. and Voltas Limited - A TATA Enterprise, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9