Comparison Overview

TP-Link Systems Inc.

VS

LG Electronics

TP-Link Systems Inc.

10 Mauchly, None, Irvine, California, US, 92618
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 700 and 749

Headquartered in the United States, TP-Link Systems Inc. is a global provider of reliable networking devices and smart home products, consistently ranked as the world's top provider of Wi-Fi devices. The company is committed to delivering innovative products that enhance people's lives through faster, more reliable connectivity. With a commitment to excellence, TP-Link serves customers in over 170 countries and continues to grow its global footprint. For career-related inquiries, please contact [email protected].

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 265
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

LG Electronics

20 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, undefined, 150-721, KR
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 700 and 749

Step into the innovative world of LG Electronics. As a global leader in technology, LG Electronics is dedicated to creating innovative solutions for a better life. Our brand promise, 'Life's Good', embodies our commitment to ensuring a happier, better life for all.    With a rich history spanning over six decades and a global presence of more than 100 subsidiaries, we operate on a truly global scale. Since our establishment in 1958, our dedication to enhancing lives worldwide through innovative products has remained unwavering. Our business domains include Home Appliance & Air Solution, Home Entertainment, Vehicle Components Solutions, and Business Solutions.   Our management philosophy, "Jeong-do Management," embodies our commitment to high ethical standards and transparent operations. Grounded in the principles of 'Customer-Value Creation' and 'People-Oriented Management', these values shape our corporate culture, fostering creativity, diversity, and integrity. At LG, we believe in the power of collective wisdom, fostering a collaborative work environment.   Join us and become a part of a company that is not just about creating solutions for a better life,  because at LG, Life's Good.

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 62,227
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lg-electronics.jpeg
LG Electronics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TP-Link Systems Inc.
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LG Electronics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

TP-Link Systems Inc. has 185.71% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

LG Electronics has 185.71% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — TP-Link Systems Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TP-Link Systems Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LG Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LG Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tp-link.jpeg
TP-Link Systems Inc.
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lg-electronics.jpeg
LG Electronics
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: supply-chain compromise (contractor access), infostealer malware (historical TTP of '888')
Motivation: financial gain (historical monetization via cryptocurrency), reputation (high-profile targeting)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2020
Type:Breach
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2017
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

LG Electronics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TP-Link Systems Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

LG Electronics company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to TP-Link Systems Inc. company.

In the current year, LG Electronics and TP-Link Systems Inc. have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

LG Electronics company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while TP-Link Systems Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both LG Electronics company and TP-Link Systems Inc. company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither LG Electronics company nor TP-Link Systems Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TP-Link Systems Inc. company nor LG Electronics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TP-Link Systems Inc. nor LG Electronics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

LG Electronics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TP-Link Systems Inc. company.

LG Electronics company employs more people globally than TP-Link Systems Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computers and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither TP-Link Systems Inc. nor LG Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TP-Link Systems Inc. nor LG Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TP-Link Systems Inc. nor LG Electronics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TP-Link Systems Inc. nor LG Electronics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TP-Link Systems Inc. nor LG Electronics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TP-Link Systems Inc. nor LG Electronics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

In GnuPG through 2.4.8, if a signed message has \f at the end of a plaintext line, an adversary can construct a modified message that places additional text after the signed material, such that signature verification of the modified message succeeds (although an "invalid armor" message is printed during verification). This is related to use of \f as a marker to denote truncation of a long plaintext line.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Description

A vulnerability has been found in jackq XCMS up to 3fab5342cc509945a7ce1b8ec39d19f701b89261. Affected is the function Upload of the file Admin/Home/Controller/ProductImageController.class.php of the component Backend. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to unrestricted upload. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1 when using the PDO PostgreSQL driver with PDO::ATTR_EMULATE_PREPARES enabled, an invalid character sequence (such as \x99) in a prepared statement parameter may cause the quoting function PQescapeStringConn to return NULL, leading to a null pointer dereference in pdo_parse_params() function. This may lead to crashes (segmentation fault) and affect the availability of the target server.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

In PHP versions:8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1, a heap buffer overflow occurs in array_merge() when the total element count of packed arrays exceeds 32-bit limits or HT_MAX_SIZE, due to an integer overflow in the precomputation of element counts using zend_hash_num_elements(). This may lead to memory corruption or crashes and affect the integrity and availability of the target server.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Description

In PHP versions:8.1.* before 8.1.34, 8.2.* before 8.2.30, 8.3.* before 8.3.29, 8.4.* before 8.4.16, 8.5.* before 8.5.1, the getimagesize() function may leak uninitialized heap memory into the APPn segments (e.g., APP1) when reading images in multi-chunk mode (such as via php://filter). This occurs due to a bug in php_read_stream_all_chunks() that overwrites the buffer without advancing the pointer, leaving tail bytes uninitialized. This may lead to information disclosure of sensitive heap data and affect the confidentiality of the target server.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X