Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TP-Link Research America Corp.TP-Link Research America Corp.
VS
LG ElectronicsLG Electronics
TP-Link Research America Corp.

TP-Link Research America Corp.

245 Charcot Ave, San Jose, 95131, US

Last Update: 28/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.kasasmart.com/us
747/1000Moderate

TP-Link is the world’s number one provider of consumer networking and smart home devices. We continuously develop new products and technologies that transform the way people connect and interact with their environment. Anchored by a research team of nearly 900 engineers...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
LG Electronics

LG Electronics

20 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-721, KR

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://globalcareers.lge.com
716/1000Moderate

Step into the innovative world of LG Electronics. As a global leader in technology, LG Electronics is dedicated to creating innovative solutions for a better life. Our brand promise, 'Life's Good', embodies our commitment to ensuring a happier, better life for all.    W...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:63,995
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TP-Link Research America Corp.

TP-Link Research America Corp.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LG Electronics

LG Electronics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

TP-Link Research America Corp. has 43.5% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LG Electronics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TP-Link Research America Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TP-Link Research America Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LG Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LG Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TP-Link Research America Corp.

TP-Link Research America Corp.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HUATP-1785227245
LG Electronics

LG Electronics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LG-1232512111725
🔒 Incident : Breach
LGE2248222
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LGE15121122

FAQ

Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and LG Electronics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. and LG Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. and LG Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TP-Link Research America Corp. or LG Electronics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TP-Link Research America Corp. or LG Electronics ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. and LG Electronics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. and LG Electronics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3