Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TP-Link Research America Corp.TP-Link Research America Corp.
VS
HARMAN InternationalHARMAN International
TP-Link Research America Corp.

TP-Link Research America Corp.

245 Charcot Ave, San Jose, 95131, US

Last Update: 28/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.kasasmart.com/us
747/1000Moderate

TP-Link is the world’s number one provider of consumer networking and smart home devices. We continuously develop new products and technologies that transform the way people connect and interact with their environment. Anchored by a research team of nearly 900 engineers...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

400 Atlantic St, Stamford, 06901, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.harman.com
796/1000Fair

Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, HARMAN (harman.com) designs and engineers connected products and solutions for automakers, consumers, and enterprises worldwide, including connected car systems, audio and visual products, enterprise automation solutions; and serv...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:28,758
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TP-Link Research America Corp.

TP-Link Research America Corp.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

TP-Link Research America Corp. has 43.5% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HARMAN International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TP-Link Research America Corp. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TP-Link Research America Corp. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HARMAN International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HARMAN International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TP-Link Research America Corp.

TP-Link Research America Corp.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HUATP-1785227245
HARMAN International

HARMAN International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. company and HARMAN International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. and HARMAN International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. and HARMAN International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TP-Link Research America Corp. or HARMAN International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TP-Link Research America Corp. or HARMAN International ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. and HARMAN International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TP-Link Research America Corp. and HARMAN International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA