Comparison Overview
TP-LINK Deutschland GmbH

TP-LINK Deutschland GmbH
Am Trippelsberg 100, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, 40589, DE
Last Update: 20/03/2026
TP-LINK is a global provider of SOHO networking products and No.1 market share holder in China, with products available in over 100 countries to tens of millions customers. Committed to powerful R&D, effective production and strict quality management, TP-LINK continues ...

FIS
601 Riverside Ave, Jacksonville, FL, US, 32202
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Unlocking financial technology. Bringing the world’s money into harmony. At FIS, we advance the way the world pays, banks, and invests. With decades of expertise, we provide financial technology solutions to financial institutions, businesses, and developers. Headquart...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

TP-LINK Deutschland GmbH







FIS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TP-LINK Deutschland GmbH in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for FIS in 2026.
Incident History - TP-LINK Deutschland GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TP-LINK Deutschland GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - FIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
FIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

TP-LINK Deutschland GmbH

FIS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.