Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Toys"R"Us CanadaToys"R"Us Canada
VS
TFG (The Foschini Group)TFG (The Foschini Group)
Toys"R"Us Canada

Toys"R"Us Canada

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.toysrus.ca
611/1000Poor

Since 1984, Toys“R”Us Canada – in concert with Babies“R”Us Canada and HMV Canada – has been synonymous with FUN. In-store and online, we’re the country’s dedicated specialty retailer of toys and baby products – 100% owned and operated by an independent, proudly Canadian...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:369
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
TFG (The Foschini Group)

TFG (The Foschini Group)

340 Voortrekker Road, Cape Town, 7500, ZA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tfgcareers.co.za
773/1000Fair

TFG holds a diversified portfolio of speciality retail assets across various product categories and consumer segments. The Group has a portfolio of 35 leading retail brands, with over 4600 outlets in 23 countries on five continents, offering customers a variety of speci...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:27,962
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Toys"R"Us Canada

Toys"R"Us Canada

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TFG (The Foschini Group)

TFG (The Foschini Group)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toys"R"Us Canada in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TFG (The Foschini Group) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Toys"R"Us Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toys"R"Us Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TFG (The Foschini Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TFG (The Foschini Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Toys"R"Us Canada

Toys"R"Us Canada

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TOY1092310102425
🔒 Incident : Breach
TOY4892948102325
🔒 Incident : Breach
TOY2192021102525
TFG (The Foschini Group)

TFG (The Foschini Group)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada company and TFG (The Foschini Group) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada and TFG (The Foschini Group), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada and TFG (The Foschini Group), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Toys"R"Us Canada or TFG (The Foschini Group) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Toys"R"Us Canada or TFG (The Foschini Group) ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada and TFG (The Foschini Group), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Toys"R"Us Canada and TFG (The Foschini Group), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8