Comparison Overview

Toyota Motor Corporation

VS

Ashok Leyland

Toyota Motor Corporation

1 Toyota-Cho, None, Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture, JP, 471-8571
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Toyota Motor Corporation is a global automotive industry leader manufacturing vehicles in 27 countries or regions and marketing the company’s products in over 170 countries and regions. Founded in 1937 and headquartered in Toyota City, Japan, Toyota Motor Corporation employs nearly 350,000 people globally.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 31,153
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Ashok Leyland

No.1 Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600032, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Ashok Leyland vehicles have built a reputation for reliability and ruggedness. The 5,00,000 vehicles we have put on the roads have considerably eased the additional pressure placed on road transportation in independent India. In the populous Indian metros, four out of the five State Transport Undertaking (STU) buses come from Ashok Leyland. Some of them like the double-decker and vestibule buses are unique models from Ashok Leyland, tailor-made for high-density routes. The blueprint prepared for the future reflected the global ambitions of the company, captured in four words: Global Standards, Global Markets. This was at a time when liberalisation and globalisation were not yet in the air. Ashok Leyland embarked on a major product and process upgradation to match world-class standards of technology. In the journey towards global standards of quality, Ashok Leyland reached a major milestone in 1993 when it became the first in India's automobile history to win the ISO 9002 certification. The more comprehensive ISO 9001 certification came in 1994, QS 9000 in 1998 and ISO 14001 certification for all vehicle manufacturing units in 2002. It has also become the first Indian auto company to receive the latest ISO/TS 16949 Corporate Certification (in July 2006) which is specific to the auto industry.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 23,661
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toyota.jpeg
Toyota Motor Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ashok-leyland.jpeg
Ashok Leyland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Toyota Motor Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ashok Leyland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Toyota Motor Corporation has 426.32% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ashok Leyland in 2025.

Incident History — Toyota Motor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toyota Motor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ashok Leyland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ashok Leyland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toyota.jpeg
Toyota Motor Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Salesforce Customer Instances, OAuth Abuse, Third-Party App Compromises (e.g., Salesloft’s Drift/Drift), VPN Masking for Exfiltration, Weak 2FA Enforcement
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Extortion), Data Theft for Resale/Leverage, Public Disclosure Threats, Litigation Support as Pressure Tactic
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Vulnerabilities within interconnected systems, Advanced reconnaissance techniques, Persistent access mechanisms
Motivation: Strategic objectives, Political objectives, Reputation damage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Improperly setup cloud services
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ashok-leyland.jpeg
Ashok Leyland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ashok Leyland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Toyota Motor Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Toyota Motor Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ashok Leyland company has not reported any.

In the current year, Toyota Motor Corporation company has reported more cyber incidents than Ashok Leyland company.

Toyota Motor Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Ashok Leyland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Toyota Motor Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Ashok Leyland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Toyota Motor Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Ashok Leyland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation company nor Ashok Leyland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Ashok Leyland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation company nor Ashok Leyland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Toyota Motor Corporation company employs more people globally than Ashok Leyland company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Ashok Leyland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Ashok Leyland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Ashok Leyland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Ashok Leyland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Ashok Leyland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Ashok Leyland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H