Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO)Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO)
VS
South African Revenue Service (SARS)South African Revenue Service (SARS)
Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO)

Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO)

900 Boulevard René-Lévesque Est, Québec, G1R 2B5, CA

Last Update: 03/01/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Le ministère du Tourisme a pour mission de soutenir le développement et la promotion du tourisme au Québec et la concertation et le partenariat des intervenants associés à ce développement et à cette promotion. Cette page est administrée selon la nétiquette du Ministèr...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:205
Subsidiaries:42
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
South African Revenue Service (SARS)

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Lehae La Sars, Pretoria, 0001, ZA

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sars.gov.za
795/1000Fair

Its main functions are to: collect and administer all national taxes, duties and levies; collect revenue that may be imposed under any other legislation, as agreed on between SARS and an organ of state or institution entitled to the revenue; provide protection a...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:11,341
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO)

Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
South African Revenue Service (SARS)

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South African Revenue Service (SARS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - South African Revenue Service (SARS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South African Revenue Service (SARS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO)

Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
South African Revenue Service (SARS)

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) or South African Revenue Service (SARS) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) or South African Revenue Service (SARS) ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ministère du Tourisme du Québec (MTO) and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103761
SUMMARY

Mooncake transfer engine through 0.3.13.post1 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability in TransferMetadata::receivePeerNotify that allows unauthenticated attackers to grow process memory without limit. Attackers can repeatedly send notify frames up to 1 MB to the handshake RPC port, filling the uncapped notifys vector until the out-of-memory killer terminates the engine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-103760
SUMMARY

Mooncake transfer engine through 0.3.13.post1 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to block the handshake daemon by never reading replies. Attackers can send a Metadata request to the handshake RPC port and stall SocketHandShakePlugin's single listener thread in writeFully(), breaking all subsequent handshakes, metadata fetches, notify and probe requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-71427
SUMMARY

Office-PowerPoint-MCP-Server through 2.0.7 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows MCP callers to write and read files outside the working directory by supplying absolute paths or ../ sequences. Attackers can steer an AI agent via prompt injection to abuse save_presentation, open_presentation, or manage_image output_path to overwrite any server-writable file or load external files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86344
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a complete LDAP operation followed by the first bytes of an incomplete LDAPMessage on the same connection, causing the server to hand that connection to a second worker thread before the first worker's result is flushed. The second worker blocks until nsslapd-ioblocktimeout while holding the connection mutex, preventing delivery of the completed operation's result. Repeating this across a small number of connections proportional to the configured worker-thread pool size exhausts the entire pool under default configuration, denying service to all clients (anonymous and authenticated, plaintext and TLS) for as long as the attacker maintains the connections.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-71454
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in CWE-79 - Cross-site Scripting CAPEC-63 allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects CAPEC-63: before 3.0b63.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA