Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TotalVerifyTotalVerify
VS
LexisNexis Risk SolutionsLexisNexis Risk Solutions
TotalVerify

TotalVerify

11432 Lackland Rd, St. Louis, MO, US, 63146

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
678/1000Weak

The TotalVerify™ data hub from Equifax offers differentiated data and unique datasets through verification, investigation, and monitoring solutions. Our broad solution set can help deliver the information you need to build trust, enable safety, verify information, and/o...

NAICS:518
NAICS Definition:Data Processing, Hosting and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
LexisNexis Risk Solutions

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

1000 Alderman Drive, Alpharetta, GA, US, 30005

Last Update: 24/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://risk.lexisnexis.com
686/1000Weak

At LexisNexis Risk Solutions®, we believe in using data for good to solve problems and make a positive impact on people, industry and society. We deliver enhanced value to our customers by leveraging the power of insight through data, advanced analytics and innovative t...

NAICS:518
NAICS Definition:Data Processing, Hosting and Related Services
Employees:10,043
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TotalVerify

TotalVerify

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LexisNexis Risk Solutions

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Data Infrastructure and Analytics Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TotalVerify in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Data Infrastructure and Analytics Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LexisNexis Risk Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TotalVerify (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TotalVerify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LexisNexis Risk Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LexisNexis Risk Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TotalVerify

TotalVerify

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VERTOT1768240241
LexisNexis Risk Solutions

LexisNexis Risk Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LEX1007052925
🔒 Incident : Breach
LEX230072825

FAQ

Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TotalVerify company and LexisNexis Risk Solutions company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TotalVerify and LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TotalVerify and LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TotalVerify or LexisNexis Risk Solutions ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TotalVerify or LexisNexis Risk Solutions ?
Between TotalVerify and LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TotalVerify and LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103761
SUMMARY

Mooncake transfer engine through 0.3.13.post1 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability in TransferMetadata::receivePeerNotify that allows unauthenticated attackers to grow process memory without limit. Attackers can repeatedly send notify frames up to 1 MB to the handshake RPC port, filling the uncapped notifys vector until the out-of-memory killer terminates the engine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-103760
SUMMARY

Mooncake transfer engine through 0.3.13.post1 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to block the handshake daemon by never reading replies. Attackers can send a Metadata request to the handshake RPC port and stall SocketHandShakePlugin's single listener thread in writeFully(), breaking all subsequent handshakes, metadata fetches, notify and probe requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-71427
SUMMARY

Office-PowerPoint-MCP-Server through 2.0.7 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows MCP callers to write and read files outside the working directory by supplying absolute paths or ../ sequences. Attackers can steer an AI agent via prompt injection to abuse save_presentation, open_presentation, or manage_image output_path to overwrite any server-writable file or load external files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86344
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a complete LDAP operation followed by the first bytes of an incomplete LDAPMessage on the same connection, causing the server to hand that connection to a second worker thread before the first worker's result is flushed. The second worker blocks until nsslapd-ioblocktimeout while holding the connection mutex, preventing delivery of the completed operation's result. Repeating this across a small number of connections proportional to the configured worker-thread pool size exhausts the entire pool under default configuration, denying service to all clients (anonymous and authenticated, plaintext and TLS) for as long as the attacker maintains the connections.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-71454
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in CWE-79 - Cross-site Scripting CAPEC-63 allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects CAPEC-63: before 3.0b63.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA