Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving SolutionsTotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions
VS
PETRONASPETRONAS
TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions

TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions

La Défense Cedex, None, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, None

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.totalenergies.com
751/1000Fair

TotalEnergies has been a reliable partner to professionals in the construction & mining / earth-moving sector for decades and provides a wide range of solutions to meet the rapidly evolving needs of this sector. Today more than ever, we’re committed to helping construc...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PETRONAS

PETRONAS

Kuala Lumpur, 50088, MY

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
801/1000Good

Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS) is a leading global energy company committed to powering society’s progress in a responsible and sustainable manner. With close to 50,000 employees and a global reach spanning over 100 countries, we are ranked among the world’s large...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:39,979
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions

TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PETRONAS

PETRONAS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PETRONAS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PETRONAS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PETRONAS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions

TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PETRONAS

PETRONAS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions company and PETRONAS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions and PETRONAS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions and PETRONAS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions or PETRONAS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions or PETRONAS ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions and PETRONAS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TotalEnergies Construction & Earth-Moving Solutions and PETRONAS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2