Comparison Overview

Toronto Public Library

VS

Alameda County Library

Toronto Public Library

789 Yonge St, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M4W 2G8
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://tpl.ca

Toronto Public Library is the world's busiest urban public library system, with more than 46 million annual visits to our branches and online. We empower Torontonians to thrive in the digital age and knowledge economy through easy access to technology, lifelong learning, and diverse cultural and leisure experiences, where, when and how our customers need us. To learn more, visit tpl.ca.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 1,667
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Alameda County Library

2450 Stevenson Blvd., Fremont, California, US, 94538
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749
https://aclibrary.org/

Alameda County Library provides library services from ten libraries in the cities of Albany, Dublin, Fremont, Newark, and Union City and the unincorporated communities of Castro Valley and the Eden Area, including San Lorenzo and Cherryland. Alameda County Library also provides additional services through our Equitable Libraries Division via Youth and Family Services, Mobile and Outreach Services, Education and Literacy Services, and Social Justice Services. Our team is dedicated to providing a space for everyone to express and embrace our values of Authenticity, Integrity, Creativity, Curiosity, and Empathy.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 135
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/torontolibrary.jpeg
Toronto Public Library
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alameda-county-library.jpeg
Alameda County Library
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Toronto Public Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alameda County Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toronto Public Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alameda County Library in 2025.

Incident History — Toronto Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toronto Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alameda County Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alameda County Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/torontolibrary.jpeg
Toronto Public Library
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alameda-county-library.jpeg
Alameda County Library
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Alameda County Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Toronto Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Toronto Public Library company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Alameda County Library company.

In the current year, Alameda County Library company and Toronto Public Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alameda County Library company nor Toronto Public Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alameda County Library company nor Toronto Public Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Toronto Public Library company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Alameda County Library company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Toronto Public Library company nor Alameda County Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Toronto Public Library nor Alameda County Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Toronto Public Library company nor Alameda County Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Toronto Public Library company employs more people globally than Alameda County Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Toronto Public Library nor Alameda County Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Toronto Public Library nor Alameda County Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Toronto Public Library nor Alameda County Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Toronto Public Library nor Alameda County Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Toronto Public Library nor Alameda County Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Toronto Public Library nor Alameda County Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References