Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Toronto Parking AuthorityToronto Parking Authority
VS
ABM IndustriesABM Industries
Toronto Parking Authority

Toronto Parking Authority

33 Queen Street East, Toronto, ON M5C 1R5, CA

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.greenp.com/
759/1000Fair

The Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) is a City agency which operates municipal on-street metered parking and off-street parking facilities in Toronto. The TPA’s Bike Share program (Bike Share Toronto) provides bicycle rentals on a short-term basis throughout Toronto.

NAICS:561
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:155
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ABM Industries

ABM Industries

1 Liberty St, New York, US

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abm.com
774/1000Fair

ABM is one of the world’s largest providers of integrated facility, engineering, and infrastructure solutions. Every day, our over 100,000 team members deliver essential services that make spaces cleaner, safer, and efficient, enhancing the overall occupant experience. ...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:31,364
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Toronto Parking Authority

Toronto Parking Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ABM Industries

ABM Industries

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toronto Parking Authority in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABM Industries in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Toronto Parking Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toronto Parking Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ABM Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABM Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Toronto Parking Authority

Toronto Parking Authority

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ABM Industries

ABM Industries

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ABM020072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
ABM732072625

FAQ

Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority company and ABM Industries company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority and ABM Industries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority and ABM Industries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Toronto Parking Authority or ABM Industries ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Toronto Parking Authority or ABM Industries ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority and ABM Industries, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Toronto Parking Authority and ABM Industries, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3