Comparison Overview
Toro Enterprises

Toro Enterprises
2101 E Ventura Blvd, Oxnard, California, 93036, US
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Established in 1994, Toro Enterprises Inc. has served the Central and Southern regions of California in both the construction and civil based industries for over 20 years. With over two decades of knowledge and experience in road development and construction, Toro conce...

Hassan Allam Holding
Yehia Zakaria Street, Industrial-Lot 5, Sheraton Helioplis Housing., Cairo, EG
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Hassan Allam Holding is a leading group with a focus on engineering and construction, and investment and development. The Group operates in diverse sectors including infrastructure, energy, water, industrial, logistics, petrochemical, and complex large-scale projects in...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Toro Enterprises







Hassan Allam Holding






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Toro Enterprises in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hassan Allam Holding in 2026.
Incident History - Toro Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Toro Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Hassan Allam Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hassan Allam Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Toro Enterprises

Hassan Allam Holding
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.