Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Toro EnterprisesToro Enterprises
VS
Bechtel CorporationBechtel Corporation
Toro Enterprises

Toro Enterprises

2101 E Ventura Blvd, Oxnard, California, 93036, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://toroenterprises.com
714/1000Moderate

Established in 1994, Toro Enterprises Inc. has served the Central and Southern regions of California in both the construction and civil based industries for over 20 years. With over two decades of knowledge and experience in road development and construction, Toro conce...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:72
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

Reston, 20190, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bechtel.com
729/1000Moderate

Bechtel is a trusted engineering, construction and project management partner to industry and government. Differentiated by the quality of our people and our relentless drive to deliver the most successful outcomes, we align our capabilities to our customers’ objectives...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:32,575
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Toro Enterprises

Toro Enterprises

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toro Enterprises in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

Bechtel Corporation has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Toro Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toro Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bechtel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bechtel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Toro Enterprises

Toro Enterprises

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TOR940072625
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BROBECTHEORAABB1773750615
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BRO3105131112625

FAQ

Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Toro Enterprises company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Toro Enterprises and Bechtel Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Toro Enterprises and Bechtel Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Toro Enterprises or Bechtel Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Toro Enterprises or Bechtel Corporation ?
Between Toro Enterprises and Bechtel Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Toro Enterprises and Bechtel Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA