Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Toppan USA, Inc.Toppan USA, Inc.
VS
Avery DennisonAvery Dennison
Toppan USA, Inc.

Toppan USA, Inc.

603 Rehoboth Road, Griffin, GA, 30224, US

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.toppan-usa.com/
741/1000Moderate

Toppan USA, Inc. is a Georgia, USA-based subsidiary of Toppan Inc. in Japan, one of the largest printing companies in the world. In March 2016, Toppan USA launched the new plant in Griffin, Georgia. The new plant is Toppan Printing’s first overseas production base for ...

NAICS:326
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:63
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

Mentor, Ohio, US

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://averydennison.com
775/1000Fair

We are a global materials science and digital identification solutions company with locations in over 50 countries, and approximately 35,000 employees worldwide. We are Making Possible™ products and solutions that provide branding and information solutions that optimiz...

NAICS:326112
NAICS Definition:Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing
Employees:21,695
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Toppan USA, Inc.

Toppan USA, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toppan USA, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Packaging and Containers Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avery Dennison in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Toppan USA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toppan USA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Avery Dennison (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avery Dennison cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Toppan USA, Inc.

Toppan USA, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Avery Dennison

Avery Dennison

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. company and Avery Dennison company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. and Avery Dennison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. and Avery Dennison, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Toppan USA, Inc. or Avery Dennison ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Toppan USA, Inc. or Avery Dennison ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. and Avery Dennison, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Toppan USA, Inc. and Avery Dennison, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9