Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Too Good To GoToo Good To Go
VS
Bureau Veritas GroupBureau Veritas Group
Too Good To Go

Too Good To Go

Landskronagade 66, København Ø, Capital Region, 2100, DK

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://toogoodtogo.org/en
766/1000Fair

Too Good To Go is a certified B Corp social impact company that connects users with partner stores to rescue unsold food and stop it from going to waste. With 85 million registered users and 150,000 active partners in 17 countries across Europe and North America, Too Go...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:1,664
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bureau Veritas Group

Bureau Veritas Group

4 Place des Saisons, Paris, 92400, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bureauveritas.com
785/1000Fair

Bureau Veritas is a world leader in Testing, Inspection and Certification. Our mission is at the heart of key challenges: quality, health and safety, environmental protection and social responsibility. Through our wide range of expertise, impartiality and independence, ...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:54,810
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Too Good To Go

Too Good To Go

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bureau Veritas Group

Bureau Veritas Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Too Good To Go in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bureau Veritas Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Too Good To Go (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Too Good To Go cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bureau Veritas Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bureau Veritas Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Too Good To Go

Too Good To Go

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bureau Veritas Group

Bureau Veritas Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BUR1327111122

FAQ

Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Too Good To Go company and Bureau Veritas Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Too Good To Go and Bureau Veritas Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Too Good To Go and Bureau Veritas Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Too Good To Go or Bureau Veritas Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Too Good To Go or Bureau Veritas Group ?
Between Too Good To Go and Bureau Veritas Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Too Good To Go and Bureau Veritas Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-55175
SUMMARY

Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Prior to versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4 on their respective release lines, Kustomize bake operations allow unsafe YAML tag processing in rosco manifests. This can lead to remote code execution on rosco pods when performing Kustomize bakes. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-44383
SUMMARY

Multiple connections to the backend using the same charging station ID are allowed, which could allow an attacker to deploy multiple instances of malicious OCPP clients to overwhelm the backend.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42952
SUMMARY

Previously, there was no throttling on repeated authentication attempts to the charging station backend, which could allow an attacker to execute a denial-of-service attack.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-20744
SUMMARY

The charging station websocket endpoint accepts connections without proper authentication, which could lead to privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-15089
SUMMARY

vulnerability in Drupal Commerce guest registration allows . This issue affects Commerce guest registration versions: *.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA